<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anyone Know About This Slide and Film Negative Scanner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/</link>
	<description>For blogging instructions, see the "How to Use This Blog" page (in the Pages section to the right).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>You might also want to look at this side by side comparison of all the high quality scanning services.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=phRG-JoD0f6N8DrY8b8ZGLw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might also want to look at this side by side comparison of all the high quality scanning services.</p>
<p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=phRG-JoD0f6N8DrY8b8ZGLw" rel="nofollow">http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=phRG-JoD0f6N8DrY8b8ZGLw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray McAndrew</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray McAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>Thanks to all who responded to my question about the H-S Film &amp; Slide Scanner.  Lots of useful information in these postings.  It shows me how useful the Digital Photography SIG can be and the utility of the blog maintained by Carl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to all who responded to my question about the H-S Film &amp; Slide Scanner.  Lots of useful information in these postings.  It shows me how useful the Digital Photography SIG can be and the utility of the blog maintained by Carl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: openkimono</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>openkimono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 03:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>The Hammacher Schlemmer product is (how do I put this delicately?) junk.  We bought a product identical to this on sale for $80 at Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond.  After the first slide, I was unimpressed.  After the second slide, it went back to the store.

We&#039;ve subsequently moved up to a Canon CanoScan 8800F and have been pleased.  It&#039;s a mid-range product at about $170 on Amazon.com, but I think it turns out excellent images considering what I&#039;m working with (20-30 year old film slides).  I have a brief post over on my blog @ http://openkimono.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/canoscan-8800f/ which contains one of the first slides I converted.  This scanner will do 300 dpi up to 4800 dpi.

Take the advice of some others responding to this post and look around before you buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hammacher Schlemmer product is (how do I put this delicately?) junk.  We bought a product identical to this on sale for $80 at Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond.  After the first slide, I was unimpressed.  After the second slide, it went back to the store.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve subsequently moved up to a Canon CanoScan 8800F and have been pleased.  It&#8217;s a mid-range product at about $170 on Amazon.com, but I think it turns out excellent images considering what I&#8217;m working with (20-30 year old film slides).  I have a brief post over on my blog @ <a href="http://openkimono.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/canoscan-8800f/" rel="nofollow">http://openkimono.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/canoscan-8800f/</a> which contains one of the first slides I converted.  This scanner will do 300 dpi up to 4800 dpi.</p>
<p>Take the advice of some others responding to this post and look around before you buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MargaretM</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>MargaretM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t buy this scanner for myself.  Speed isn&#039;t the only thing you want to look at.  It only scans 1800 dpi.  I  scan my slides and negatives close to 4000 dpi or above.  1800 dpi will get you a 4 x 6 print.

This scanner has a 10 bit color converter....I want more than that.

My advice is to compare a couple of good quality scanners from Nikon, Epson, Canon, etc.  They will be more expensive, but they will probably give you better quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t buy this scanner for myself.  Speed isn&#8217;t the only thing you want to look at.  It only scans 1800 dpi.  I  scan my slides and negatives close to 4000 dpi or above.  1800 dpi will get you a 4 x 6 print.</p>
<p>This scanner has a 10 bit color converter&#8230;.I want more than that.</p>
<p>My advice is to compare a couple of good quality scanners from Nikon, Epson, Canon, etc.  They will be more expensive, but they will probably give you better quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picturation</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Picturation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>&gt; Sounds great, but does it work work with a Mac computer? 

Yes.  Here&#039;s a thread discussing it http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=177002</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Sounds great, but does it work work with a Mac computer? </p>
<p>Yes.  Here&#8217;s a thread discussing it <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=177002" rel="nofollow">http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=177002</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea FC</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea FC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>I believe the previous poster might have meant ScanCafe http://www.scancafe.com/ as all the information he provided can be found on the ScanCafe web site.

If you have any questions about ScanCafe&#039;s slide scanning services you can contact them online at http://www.scancafe.com/contactus.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the previous poster might have meant ScanCafe <a href="http://www.scancafe.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scancafe.com/</a> as all the information he provided can be found on the ScanCafe web site.</p>
<p>If you have any questions about ScanCafe&#8217;s slide scanning services you can contact them online at <a href="http://www.scancafe.com/contactus.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.scancafe.com/contactus.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl W Farley</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl W Farley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>If you have thousands of slides you want to copy, I would suggest you take a look at www.scancam.com. They charge $ 0.24 /slide and you only pay for the ones you want to keep!

If you really want to scan them yourself, be prepared to spend a fair amount of money and lots of time. It takes about  5 min./slide.

To buy a scanner, you need one that scans at at least 4000 dpi and at 8 bit color (RGB).

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have thousands of slides you want to copy, I would suggest you take a look at <a href="http://www.scancam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scancam.com</a>. They charge $ 0.24 /slide and you only pay for the ones you want to keep!</p>
<p>If you really want to scan them yourself, be prepared to spend a fair amount of money and lots of time. It takes about  5 min./slide.</p>
<p>To buy a scanner, you need one that scans at at least 4000 dpi and at 8 bit color (RGB).</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Stabgler</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Stabgler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2113</guid>
		<description>Sounds great, but does it work work with a Mac computer? If not, it&#039;s worthless to many photographers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great, but does it work work with a Mac computer? If not, it&#8217;s worthless to many photographers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picturation</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Picturation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>The resolution to scan slides is traditionally 2400 dpi.  But, there&#039;s more to the quality than the dpi.  

I used a Nikon LS-2000 film scanner.  They&#039;re discontinued now but you can get them on eBay for about $300 -- http://tinyurl.com/2np79p.  You want to make sure it has all the pieces that came with it originally, including software.  I think this picture shows them all http://www.joesco.com/ei/nikon01.jpg

This scanner gave me excellent results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The resolution to scan slides is traditionally 2400 dpi.  But, there&#8217;s more to the quality than the dpi.  </p>
<p>I used a Nikon LS-2000 film scanner.  They&#8217;re discontinued now but you can get them on eBay for about $300 &#8212; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2np79p" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2np79p</a>.  You want to make sure it has all the pieces that came with it originally, including software.  I think this picture shows them all <a href="http://www.joesco.com/ei/nikon01.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.joesco.com/ei/nikon01.jpg</a></p>
<p>This scanner gave me excellent results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry M House</title>
		<link>http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anyone-know-about-this-slide-and-film-negative-scanner/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry M House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halpccldp.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>Sounds awesome!  Only 5 seconds---now that is a &quot;double dog dare&quot; experience.  My HP slide scanner takes 12 seconds with lots of other things which could happen to extend the time to 25+.

I suppose you connect it to a movable memory, download it to your CPU, then do some slide corrective activities to finally get the slide to the proper quality.

A test run certainly would be worth the time and effort..

Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds awesome!  Only 5 seconds&#8212;now that is a &#8220;double dog dare&#8221; experience.  My HP slide scanner takes 12 seconds with lots of other things which could happen to extend the time to 25+.</p>
<p>I suppose you connect it to a movable memory, download it to your CPU, then do some slide corrective activities to finally get the slide to the proper quality.</p>
<p>A test run certainly would be worth the time and effort..</p>
<p>Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
